Art of Problem Solving

2025 AMC 12A Problems/Problem 15

The following problem is from both the 2025 AMC 10A #21 and 2025 AMC 12A #15, so both problems redirect to this page.

Problem

A set of numbers is called sum-free if whenever $x$ and $y$ are (not necessarily distinct) elements of the set, $x+y$ is not an element of the set. For example, $\{1,4,6\}$ and the empty set are sum-free, but $\{2,4,5\}$ is not. What is the greatest possible number of elements in a sum-free subset of $\{1,2,3,...,20\}$?

$\textbf{(A) } 8 \qquad\textbf{(B) } 9 \qquad\textbf{(C) } 10 \qquad\textbf{(D) } 11 \qquad\textbf{(E) } 12$

Solution 1

Let our subset be $\{11,12,13,...,20\}.$ If we add any element from the set $\{1,2,3,...,10\}$ to our current subset, we will have to remove at least one element from our subset. Hence, the maximum size of our subset is $\boxed{\text{(C) }10}$.

~Tacos_are_yummy_1

~nithins minor edit

Solution 2(Quicksolve)

Notice that an odd number plus an odd number always results in an even number. Consider the subset of all odd numbers $S = \{1, 3, 5, ..., 19\}$. The addition of any even number will result in a violation of the rules, so the maximum number of elements in this subset is $\boxed{\text{(C) }10}$.

~Kevin Wang

~nithins minor edit

Note (Those who know)

This problem is essentially the same as 2022 AMC 10B Problem 14.

~metrixgo

Solution 3

Let $S = \{1, 2, 3, ..., 20\}$. We are looking for the largest possible sum-free subset $A \subseteq S$.

First, we show that a sum-free set of size 10 is possible. Consider the set $A_1 = \{11, 12, ..., 20\}$. The smallest possible sum of two elements (not necessarily distinct) from this set is $11 + 11 = 22$. Since $22 > 20$, no sum of two elements from $A_1$ can be in $A_1$. The size of $A_1$ is $20 - 11 + 1 = 10$. Thus, a sum-free set of size 10 exists.

Next, we prove that no sum-free set $A \subseteq S$ can have 11 or more elements. Let $m$ be the largest element in $A$. Since $A$ is sum-free and $m \in A$, for any $x \in A$, we must have $m-x \notin A$ (unless $x = m-x$, in which case $x \notin A$). This is because if both $x$ and $m-x$ were in $A$, their sum $x + (m-x) = m$ would be in $A$, which is a contradiction.

We can partition the set $\{1, 2, ..., m\}$ into pairs that sum to $m$, plus any leftover elements.

Case 1: $m$ is even. Let $m = 2k$. The numbers in $\{1, ..., m\}$ can be grouped as: $\{ (1, 2k-1), (2, 2k-2), ..., (k-1, k+1) \}$ along with the numbers $k$ and $m=2k$.

  • $A$ contains $m$.
  • $A$ cannot contain $k$, because $k+k = 2k = m$, which is in $A$.
  • $A$ can contain at most one number from each of the $k-1$ pairs.

The maximum number of elements $A$ can contain from $\{1, ..., m\}$ is $1 + 0 + (k-1) = k = m/2$. Since $m \le 20$, the maximum size of $A$ is $m/2 \le 20/2 = 10$.

Case 2: $m$ is odd. Let $m = 2k-1$. The numbers in $\{1, ..., m\}$ can be grouped as: $\{ (1, 2k-2), (2, 2k-3), ..., (k-1, k) \}$ along with $m=2k-1$.

  • $A$ contains $m$.
  • $A$ can contain at most one number from each of the $k-1$ pairs.

The maximum number of elements $A$ can contain from $\{1, ..., m\}$ is $1 + (k-1) = k$. Since $m = 2k-1$, we have $k = (m+1)/2$. The largest possible odd $m$ is 19. If $m=19$, $k = (19+1)/2 = 10$. So the maximum size of $A$ is $(m+1)/2 \le (19+1)/2 = \boxed{\textbf{(C) } 10}$.

In all cases, a sum-free subset of $S$ can have at most 10 elements. Since we found a set with 10 elements, the greatest possible number of elements is $10$.

Solution 4 (Another quicksolve)

Note that selecting integers from $\{11, 12, ..., 20\}$ also satisfy the constraints of the problem. The minimum sum of any two members of the set is $11 + 11 = 22$ which is greater than any of the elements.

Solution 5 (with quick proof)

As all of the above solutions point out, the set $\{11, ..., 20\}$ satisfies the required condition, and so the greatest size of a sum-free set is no less than 10. How do we know that 11 isn't possible? Induction is our friend here.

We want to prove that the set $\{1, ..., 2n\}$ has a sum-free set of size no more than $n$. It is obvious for $n=1$. Suppose it is true for $n-1$. Now let $S$ be a sum-free subset of $\{1, ..., 2n\}$ and that it has at least $n+1$ elements. The intersection of $S$ and $\{1, ..., 2n-2\}$ is sum-free, so it has no more than $n-1$ elements. So we must include both $2n-1$ and $2n$ into $S$. If so, then $1$ and $n$ cannot belong to $S$.

We are now searching for $n-1$ more elements. But we can make $n-2$ 'pigeonholes': $\{2, 2n-2\}, \{3, 2n-3\}, ..., \{n-1, n+1\}$, seeing that they can provide no more than $n-2$ elements because each pigeonhole will have a sum of $2n$.

Video Solution (Really Easy in 2 Mins)

https://youtu.be/V_zh78Ae8xw?si=XAqyWvFhETXUWmCc ~ Pi Academy

Chinese Video Solution

https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1cLkQBpEhU/

~metrixgo

Video Solution by OmegaLearn

https://youtu.be/GgNQ2yDGIRg

Video Solution by SpreadTheMathLove

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAeyV60Hu5c

See Also

2025 AMC 10A (ProblemsAnswer KeyResources)
Preceded by
Problem 20
Followed by
Problem 22
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
All AMC 10 Problems and Solutions
2025 AMC 12A (ProblemsAnswer KeyResources)
Preceded by
Problem 14
Followed by
Problem 16
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
All AMC 12 Problems and Solutions

These problems are copyrighted © by the Mathematical Association of America.