2007 USAMO Problems/Problem 5: Difference between revisions
5849206328x (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
5849206328x (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
=== Solution 1 === | === Solution 1 === | ||
The proof is by induction. The base is provided by the <math>n = 0</math> case, where <math>7^{7^0} + 1 = 7^1 + 1 = 2^3</math>. To prove the inductive step, it suffices to show that if <math>x = 7^{2m - 1}</math> for some positive integer <math>m</math> then <math>(x^7 + 1)/(x + 1)</math> is composite. As a consequence, <math>x^7 + 1</math> has at least two more prime factors than does <math>x + 1</math>. To confirm that <math>(x^7 + 1)/(x + 1)</math> is composite, observe that | |||
<cmath>\begin{align*} | |||
\frac{x^7 + 1}{x + 1} &= \frac{(x + 1)^7 - ((x + 1)^7 - (x^7 + 1))}{x + 1} \\ | |||
&= (x + 1)^6 - \frac{7x(x^5 + 3x^4 + 5x^3 + 5x^2 + 3x + 1)}{x + 1} \\ | |||
&= (x + 1)^6 - 7x(x^4 + 2x^3 + 3x^2 + 2x + 1) \\ | |||
< | &= (x + 1)^6 - 7^{2m}(x^2 + x + 1)^2 \\ | ||
&= \{(x + 1)^3 - 7^m(x^2 + x + 1)\}\{(x + 1)^3 + 7^m(x^2 + x + 1)\}. | |||
\end{align*}</cmath> | |||
Also each factor exceeds 1. It suffices to check the smaller one; <math>\sqrt{7x}\leq x</math> gives | |||
<cmath>\begin{align*} | |||
(x + 1)^3 - 7^m(x^2 + x + 1) &= (x + 1)^3 - \sqrt{7x}(x^2 + x + 1) \\ | |||
&\geq x^3 + 3x^2 + 3x + 1 - x(x^2 + x + 1) \\ | |||
&= 2x^2 + 2x + 1\geq 113 > 1. | |||
<cmath>\ | \end{align*}</cmath> | ||
Hence <math>(x^7 + 1)/(x + 1)</math> is composite and the proof is complete. | |||
{{alternate solutions}} | {{alternate solutions}} | ||
Revision as of 08:47, 7 August 2014
Problem
(Titu Andreescu) Prove that for every nonnegative integer
, the number
is the product of at least
(not necessarily distinct) primes.
Solutions
Solution 1
The proof is by induction. The base is provided by the
case, where
. To prove the inductive step, it suffices to show that if
for some positive integer
then
is composite. As a consequence,
has at least two more prime factors than does
. To confirm that
is composite, observe that
Also each factor exceeds 1. It suffices to check the smaller one;
gives
Hence
is composite and the proof is complete.
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.
See also
- <url>viewtopic.php?t=145849 Discussion on AoPS/MathLinks</url>
| 2007 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
| Preceded by Problem 4 |
Followed by Problem 6 | |
| 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | ||
| All USAMO Problems and Solutions | ||
These problems are copyrighted © by the Mathematical Association of America.