2016 IMO Problems/Problem 4: Difference between revisions
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Solution== | ==Solution== | ||
Consider <math>P(x)</math> and <math>P(x+y)</math>. We note that in order to <math>p \mid P(x)</math> and <math>p \mid P(x+y)-P(x)</math> we must have <math>p \mid x^2+x+1</math> and <math>p \mid y(2x+y+1)</math>. It is obvious that <math>p \equiv 1 \pmod{6}</math> since <math>p \mid n^2+n+1 \mid (2n+1)^2+3</math> or <math>\left( \tfrac{-3}{p} \right)=1</math>. | Consider <math>P(x)</math> and <math>P(x+y)</math>. We note that in order to <math>p \mid P(x)</math> and <math>p \mid P(x+y)-P(x)</math> we must have <math>p \mid x^2+x+1</math> and <math>p \mid y(2x+y+1)</math>. It is obvious that <math>p \equiv 1 \pmod{6}</math> since <math>p \mid n^2+n+1 \mid (2n+1)^2+3</math> or <math>\left( \tfrac{-3}{p} \right)=1</math>. | ||
Latest revision as of 03:18, 26 March 2024
Problem
A set of positive integers is called fragrant if it contains at least two elements and each of its elements has a prime factor in common with at least one of the other elements. Let
. What is the least possible positive integer value of
such that there exists a non-negative integer
for which the set
is fragrant?
Solution
Consider
and
. We note that in order to
and
we must have
and
. It is obvious that
since
or
.
If
then
implies
. WLOG, we can let
and see that
. So there doesn't exists
so that
.
If
, we find
and we let
. Hence, from
we get
. So there is one prime
such that
.
If
, it is obvious that
satisfy and is the only answer.
If
, we do the similar thing and get
and
so
.
___________________________
Now, back to the problem, since there doesn't exists any prime
for
so
. The only prime for
is
so if we choose
then there will be a number
remains. This means
since we need a prime
and
but
since
.
If
, we consider two cases, where there are two numbers that are divisible by
(which means
), the middle-three numbers
we can't find a way make each two of them have common prime factor. If no two are divisible by
then they can only be divisible by
, but it can't cover all
"consecutive" numbers.
If
then we can pick
.
So the final answer is
.
See Also
| 2016 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
| Preceded by Problem 3 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 5 |
| All IMO Problems and Solutions | ||