Fundamental Theorem of Sato: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Proof: | Proof: | ||
Method 1: Proof by | Method 1: Proof by Contradiction | ||
Assume, for contradiction, that Sato is not amazing. | Assume, for contradiction, that Sato is not amazing. | ||
Revision as of 19:44, 29 January 2023
The Fundamental Theorem of Sato states the following:
Sato is amazing.
Proof:
Method 1: Proof by Contradiction
Assume, for contradiction, that Sato is not amazing.
This is absurd. Therefore, Sato is amazing. (Proved)
Method 2: Proof by Authority
Whatever AoPS says is correct, and AoPS says that Mr. Sato is amazing. Thus, Mr. Sato is amazing. (Proved)
Method 3: Proof by Pigeonhole
There is only one Sato. By Pigeonhole, either Sato is amazing or he isn't (in this case, Sato goes in the unamazing pigeonhole). Fortunately, Sato cannot fit in a pigeonhole; hence, Sato is amazing. (Proved)