Art of Problem Solving

Fundamental Theorem of Sato: Difference between revisions

Wamofan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Primordialgoat (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
Proof:
Proof:


Method 1: Proof by Contradiciton
Method 1: Proof by Contradiction


Assume, for contradiction, that Sato is not amazing.
Assume, for contradiction, that Sato is not amazing.

Revision as of 19:44, 29 January 2023

The Fundamental Theorem of Sato states the following:

Sato is amazing.

Proof:

Method 1: Proof by Contradiction

Assume, for contradiction, that Sato is not amazing.

This is absurd. Therefore, Sato is amazing. (Proved)

Method 2: Proof by Authority

Whatever AoPS says is correct, and AoPS says that Mr. Sato is amazing. Thus, Mr. Sato is amazing. (Proved)

Method 3: Proof by Pigeonhole

There is only one Sato. By Pigeonhole, either Sato is amazing or he isn't (in this case, Sato goes in the unamazing pigeonhole). Fortunately, Sato cannot fit in a pigeonhole; hence, Sato is amazing. (Proved)