2007 USAMO Problems/Problem 5: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
{{USAMO newbox|year=2007|num-b=4|num-a=6}} | {{USAMO newbox|year=2007|num-b=4|num-a=6}} | ||
Let <math>\displaystyle{a_{n}}</math> be <math>7^{7^{n}}+1</math>. We prove the result by induction. | |||
The result is true for <math>\displaystyle{n=0}</math> because <math>\displaystyle{a_0 = 2^3}</math> which is the product of <math>3</math> primes. Now we assume the result hold for <math>\displaystyle{n}</math>. We note that the sequence of <math>\displaystyle{a_{n}}</math> is defined by the recursion | |||
<math>\displaystyle{a_{n+1}= (a_{n}-1)^{7}+1}</math> | |||
<math>= a_{n}^{7}-7a_{n}^{6}+21a_{n}^{5}-35a_{n}^{4}+35a_{n}^{3}-21a_{n}^{2}+7a_{n}</math> | |||
<math>= a_{n}^{7}-7a_{n}(a_{n}^{5}-3a_{n}^{4}+5a_{n}^{3}-5a_{n}^{2}+3a_{n}-1)</math> | |||
<math>= a_{n}^{7}-7a_{n}(a_{n}-1)(a_{n}^{4}-2a_{n}^{3}+3a_{n}^{2}-2a_{n}+1)</math> | |||
<math>= a_{n}\left(a_{n}^{6}-7(a_{n}-1)(a_{n}^{4}-2a_{n}^{3}+3a_{n}^{2}-2a_{n}+1)\right)</math> | |||
<math>= a_{n}\left(a_{n}^{6}-7(a_{n}-1)(a_{n}^{2}-a_{n}+1)^{2}\right)</math>. | |||
Since <math>\displaystyle{a_n - 1}</math> is an odd power of <math>7</math>, <math>\displaystyle{7a_n}</math> is a perfect square. | |||
By assumption, <math>\displaystyle{a_n}</math> is divisible by <math>2n + 3</math> primes and, since the second term of the last expression above is a difference of squares and is composite, it is divisible by <math>2</math> primes. Thus <math>\displaystyle{a_{n+1}}</math> is divisible by <math>\displaystyle{(2n + 3) + 2 = 2(n+1) + 3}</math> primes as desired. | |||
Revision as of 21:23, 25 April 2007
Problem
Prove that for every nonnegative integer
, the number
is the product of at least
(not necessarily distinct) primes.
Solution
| 2007 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
| Preceded by Problem 4 |
Followed by Problem 6 | |
| 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | ||
| All USAMO Problems and Solutions | ||
Let
be
. We prove the result by induction.
The result is true for
because
which is the product of
primes. Now we assume the result hold for
. We note that the sequence of
is defined by the recursion
.
Since
is an odd power of
,
is a perfect square.
By assumption,
is divisible by
primes and, since the second term of the last expression above is a difference of squares and is composite, it is divisible by
primes. Thus
is divisible by
primes as desired.