Functional equation for the zeta function: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''functional equation for Riemann zeta function''' is a result due to analytic continuation of [[Riemann zeta function]]: | The '''functional equation for Riemann zeta function''' is a result due to analytic continuation of [[Riemann zeta function]]: | ||
| Line 17: | Line 15: | ||
</cmath> | </cmath> | ||
=== | === A formula for <math>\zeta(s)</math> in <math>-1<\sigma<0</math> === | ||
In this article, we will use the common convention that <math>s=\sigma+it</math> where <math>\sigma,t\in\mathbb R</math>. As a result, we say that the original [[Dirichlet series]] definition <math>\zeta(s)\triangleq\sum_{k=1}^\infty{1\over k^s}</math> converges only for <math>\sigma>1</math>. However, if we were to apply Euler-Maclaurin summation on this definition, we obtain | In this article, we will use the common convention that <math>s=\sigma+it</math> where <math>\sigma,t\in\mathbb R</math>. As a result, we say that the original [[Dirichlet series]] definition <math>\zeta(s)\triangleq\sum_{k=1}^\infty{1\over k^s}</math> converges only for <math>\sigma>1</math>. However, if we were to apply Euler-Maclaurin summation on this definition, we obtain | ||
| Line 28: | Line 26: | ||
<cmath> | <cmath> | ||
\begin{ | \begin{align*} | ||
\int_1^\infty{B_1(x)\over x^{s+1}}\mathrm dx | \int_1^\infty{B_1(x)\over x^{s+1}}\mathrm dx | ||
={B_2(x)\over2x^{s+1}}+{s+1\over2}\int_1^\infty{B_2(x)\over x^{s+2}}\mathrm dx | &=\left.{B_2(x)\over2x^{s+1}}\right|_1^\infty+{s+1\over2}\int_1^\infty{B_2(x)\over x^{s+2}}\mathrm dx \\ | ||
\end{ | &={B_2\over2}+{s+1\over2}\int_1^\infty{B_2(x)\over x^{s+2}}\mathrm dx | ||
\end{align*} | |||
</cmath> | </cmath> | ||
Revision as of 02:22, 13 January 2021
The functional equation for Riemann zeta function is a result due to analytic continuation of Riemann zeta function:
Proof
Two useful identities
There are multiple proofs for the functional equation for Riemann zeta function, and this page presents a light-weighted approach which merely relies on the Fourier series for the first periodic Bernoulli polynomial that
A formula for
in 
In this article, we will use the common convention that
where
. As a result, we say that the original Dirichlet series definition
converges only for
. However, if we were to apply Euler-Maclaurin summation on this definition, we obtain
in which we can extend the ROC of the latter integral to
via integration by parts: