2013 AMC 12A Problems/Problem 21: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
So <math>A<\log(2017)</math>. | So <math>A<\log(2017)</math>. | ||
But this leaves only one answer, so we are done. | But this leaves only one answer, so we are done. | ||
==Solution 3== | |||
Define <math>f(2) = \log(2)</math>, and | |||
<math>f(n) = \log(n+f(n-1)), \quad \text{ for } n > 2.</math> | |||
We are looking for <math>f(2013)</math>. We can show | |||
'''Lemma.''' For any integer <math>n>1</math>, if <math>n < 10^k - k</math> then <math>f(n) < k</math>. | |||
'''Proof.''' First note that <math>f(2) < 1</math>. Let <math>n<10^k-k</math>. Then <math>n+k<10^k</math>, so <math>\log(n+k)< k</math>. Suppose the claim is true for <math>n-1</math>. Then <math>f(n) = \log(n+f(n-1)) < \log(n + k) < k</math>. The Lemma is thus proved by induction. | |||
Finally, note that <math>2013 < 10^4 - 4</math> so that the Lemma implies that <math>f(2013) < 4</math>. | |||
This leaves only one answer <math>\boxed{\textbf{(A) } (\log 2016, \log 2017)}</math>, so we are done. | |||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
{{AMC12 box|year=2013|ab=A|num-b=20|num-a=22}} | {{AMC12 box|year=2013|ab=A|num-b=20|num-a=22}} | ||
{{MAA Notice}} | {{MAA Notice}} | ||
Revision as of 00:32, 17 December 2019
Problem
Consider
. Which of the following intervals contains
?
Solution 1
Let
and
, and from the problem description,
We can reason out an approximation, by ignoring the
:
And a better approximation, by plugging in our first approximation for
in our original definition for
:
And an even better approximation:
Continuing this pattern, obviously, will eventually terminate at
, in other words our original definition of
.
However, at
, going further than
will not distinguish between our answer choices.
is nearly indistinguishable from
.
So we take
and plug in.
Since
, we know
. This gives us our answer range:
Solution 2
Suppose
.
Then
.
So if
, then
.
So
.
Repeating, we then get
.
This is clearly absurd (the RHS continues to grow more than exponentially for each iteration).
So,
is not greater than
.
So
.
But this leaves only one answer, so we are done.
Solution 3
Define
, and
We are looking for
. We can show
Lemma. For any integer
, if
then
.
Proof. First note that
. Let
. Then
, so
. Suppose the claim is true for
. Then
. The Lemma is thus proved by induction.
Finally, note that
so that the Lemma implies that
.
This leaves only one answer
, so we are done.
See Also
| 2013 AMC 12A (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | |
| Preceded by Problem 20 |
Followed by Problem 22 |
| 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 | |
| All AMC 12 Problems and Solutions | |
These problems are copyrighted © by the Mathematical Association of America.