2016 USAJMO Problems/Problem 2: Difference between revisions
Tigerzhang (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
From this, Euler's Theorem comes to mind and we see that if <math>n-20 = \varphi\left(2^{20}\right)</math>, the equality is satisfied. Thus, we get that <math>n = 20 + 2^{19}</math>, which is less than <math>10^6</math>, and we should be done. However, this requires slightly more formalization, and can be proven directly more easily if <math>n = 20+2^{19}</math> is known or suspected. | From this, Euler's Theorem comes to mind and we see that if <math>n-20 = \varphi\left(2^{20}\right)</math>, the equality is satisfied. Thus, we get that <math>n = 20 + 2^{19}</math>, which is less than <math>10^6</math>, and we should be done. However, this requires slightly more formalization, and can be proven directly more easily if <math>n = 20+2^{19}</math> is known or suspected. | ||
==Solution 2== | |||
We divide the positive numbers into <math>999999</math> groups. | |||
{{MAA Notice}} | {{MAA Notice}} | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
{{USAJMO newbox|year=2016|num-b=1|num-a=3}} | {{USAJMO newbox|year=2016|num-b=1|num-a=3}} | ||
Revision as of 13:39, 29 June 2020
Problem
Prove that there exists a positive integer
such that
has six consecutive zeros in its decimal representation.
Solution
Let digit
of a number be the units digit, digit
be the tens digit, and so on. Let the 6 consecutive zeroes be at digits
through digit
. The criterion is then obviously equivalent to
We will prove that
satisfies this, thus proving the problem statement (since
).
We want
(
is the Euler Totient Function.) By Euler's Theorem, since gcd
= 1,
so
Since
, so
for
and
, and thus the problem statement has been proven.
Motivation for Solution
Modifying our necessary and sufficient inequality, we get:
Since gcd
if
(which is obviously true) and
which is also true given that
, we need the RHS to be greater than
:
The first
that satisfies this inequality is
, so we let
:
From this, Euler's Theorem comes to mind and we see that if
, the equality is satisfied. Thus, we get that
, which is less than
, and we should be done. However, this requires slightly more formalization, and can be proven directly more easily if
is known or suspected.
Solution 2
We divide the positive numbers into
groups.
These problems are copyrighted © by the Mathematical Association of America.
See also
| 2016 USAJMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
| Preceded by Problem 1 |
Followed by Problem 3 | |
| 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | ||
| All USAJMO Problems and Solutions | ||