2007 USAMO Problems/Problem 5: Difference between revisions
5849206328x (talk | contribs) |
Sneekifnyt1 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
\end{align*}</cmath> | \end{align*}</cmath> | ||
Hence <math>(x^7 + 1)/(x + 1)</math> is composite and the proof is complete. | Hence <math>(x^7 + 1)/(x + 1)</math> is composite and the proof is complete. | ||
=== Solution 2=== | |||
We prove by induction on <math>n</math> that <math>7^{7^n} + 1</math> is the product of at least <math>2n + 3</math> (not necessarily distinct) primes. | |||
For <math>n = 0</math>, we have <math>7^{7^0} + 1 = 7 + 1 = 8 = 2^3</math>, which has <math>3 = 2(0) + 3</math> prime factors. | |||
Thus, the base case holds. | |||
Assume that for some <math>n \ge 0</math>, the number <math>7^{7^n} + 1</math> is the product of at least <math>2n + 3</math> primes. | |||
We must show that <math>7^{7^{n+1}} + 1</math> has at least <math>2n + 5</math> prime factors. | |||
Let <math>a = 7^n</math>. Since <math>a</math> is odd, we can apply the Aurifeuillian factorization: | |||
<math>7^{7a} + 1 = (7^a + 1)\big(7^{3a} + 3\cdot7^{2a} + 3\cdot7^a + 1\big)\big(7^{\tfrac{5a}{2} + \tfrac{1}{2}} + 7^{\tfrac{3a}{2} + \tfrac{1}{2}} + 7^{\tfrac{a}{2} + \tfrac{1}{2}}\big)</math>. | |||
Each factor is an integer greater than 1, so the factorization is nontrivial. | |||
The first factor is <math>7^a + 1 = 7^{7^n} + 1</math>, which by the inductive hypothesis has at least <math>2n + 3</math> prime factors. | |||
It remains to show that the quotient | |||
<math>\frac{7^{7a} + 1}{7^a + 1}</math> | |||
is composite. | |||
From the factorization above, we have | |||
<math>\frac{7^{7a} + 1}{7^a + 1} = \big(7^{3a} + 3\cdot7^{2a} + 3\cdot7^a + 1\big)\big(7^{\tfrac{5a}{2} + \tfrac{1}{2}} + 7^{\tfrac{3a}{2} + \tfrac{1}{2}} + 7^{\tfrac{a}{2} + \tfrac{1}{2}}\big)</math>, | |||
which is clearly the product of two integers greater than 1, and thus composite. | |||
Therefore, <math>\frac{7^{7a} + 1}{7^a + 1}</math> is always composite, and hence <math>7^{7a} + 1</math> has at least two more prime factors than <math>7^a + 1</math>. | |||
By the inductive hypothesis, <math>7^a + 1</math> has at least <math>2n + 3</math> prime factors, so <math>7^{7a} + 1</math> has at least <math>(2n + 3) + 2 = 2n + 5</math> prime factors. | |||
By induction, <math>7^{7^n} + 1</math> is the product of at least <math>2n + 3</math> (not necessarily distinct) primes for all nonnegative integers <math>n</math>. | |||
{{alternate solutions}} | {{alternate solutions}} | ||
Latest revision as of 14:30, 9 October 2025
Problem
(Titu Andreescu) Prove that for every nonnegative integer
, the number
is the product of at least
(not necessarily distinct) primes.
Solutions
Solution 1
The proof is by induction. The base is provided by the
case, where
. To prove the inductive step, it suffices to show that if
for some positive integer
then
is composite. As a consequence,
has at least two more prime factors than does
. To confirm that
is composite, observe that
Also each factor exceeds 1. It suffices to check the smaller one;
gives
Hence
is composite and the proof is complete.
Solution 2
We prove by induction on
that
is the product of at least
(not necessarily distinct) primes.
For
, we have
, which has
prime factors.
Thus, the base case holds.
Assume that for some
, the number
is the product of at least
primes.
We must show that
has at least
prime factors.
Let
. Since
is odd, we can apply the Aurifeuillian factorization:
.
Each factor is an integer greater than 1, so the factorization is nontrivial.
The first factor is
, which by the inductive hypothesis has at least
prime factors.
It remains to show that the quotient
is composite.
From the factorization above, we have
,
which is clearly the product of two integers greater than 1, and thus composite.
Therefore,
is always composite, and hence
has at least two more prime factors than
.
By the inductive hypothesis,
has at least
prime factors, so
has at least
prime factors.
By induction,
is the product of at least
(not necessarily distinct) primes for all nonnegative integers
.
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.
See also
- <url>viewtopic.php?t=145849 Discussion on AoPS/MathLinks</url>
| 2007 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
| Preceded by Problem 4 |
Followed by Problem 6 | |
| 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | ||
| All USAMO Problems and Solutions | ||
These problems are copyrighted © by the Mathematical Association of America.