Talk:Divisor function: Difference between revisions
Created page with 'I would never use the phrase "divisor function" to refer to the very general <math>\sigma_k(n)</math> -- I strongly suggest that the article be rewritten to emphasize the functio…' |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I would never use the phrase "divisor function" to refer to the very general <math>\sigma_k(n)</math> -- I strongly suggest that the article be rewritten to emphasize the function <math>d(n)</math> first, and then to later comment on <math>\sigma_k(n)</math> as a generalization. Perhaps the main article for <math>\sigma_k(n)</math> could be a separate page, e.g., "sum of divisors function" (except that such a page should properly belong just to <math>\sigma(n)</math>). | I would never use the phrase "divisor function" to refer to the very general <math>\sigma_k(n)</math> -- I strongly suggest that the article be rewritten to emphasize the function <math>d(n)</math> first, and then to later comment on <math>\sigma_k(n)</math> as a generalization. Perhaps the main article for <math>\sigma_k(n)</math> could be a separate page, e.g., "sum of divisors function" (except that such a page should properly belong just to <math>\sigma(n)</math>). --[[User:JBL|JBL]] 16:58, 21 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Latest revision as of 11:58, 21 July 2009
I would never use the phrase "divisor function" to refer to the very general 
-- I strongly suggest that the article be rewritten to emphasize the function 
first, and then to later comment on as a generalization. Perhaps the main article for could be a separate page, e.g., "sum of divisors function" (except that such a page should properly belong just to 
). --JBL 16:58, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
