Ostrowski's criterion: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:26, 21 January 2025

Ostrowski's Criterion states that:

Let $f(x)=a_nx^n+a_{n-1}x^{n-1}+\cdots+a_1x+a_0\in \mathbb{Z}[x]$ . If $a_0$ is a prime and $|a_0|>|a_n|+|a_{n-1}|+\cdots+|a_1|$ then $f(x)$ is irreducible.

Proof

Let $\phi$ be a root of $f(x)$ . If $|\phi|\leq 1$ , then $|a_0|=|a_1\phi+\cdots+a_n\phi^n|\leq |a_1|+\cdots+|a_n|$ a contradiction. Therefore, $|\phi|>1$ .

Suppose $f(x)=g(x)h(x)$ . Since $f(0)=a_0$ , one of $g(0)$ and $h(0)$ is 1. WLOG, assume $g(0)=1$ . Then, let $g_n$ be the leading coefficient of $g(x)$ . If $\phi_1,\phi_2,\cdots,\phi_r$ are the roots of $g(x)$ , then $1<|\phi_1\phi_2\cdots \phi_n|=\frac{1}{|g_n|}\leq 1$ . This is a contradiction, so $f(x)$ is irreducible.

This article is a stub. Help us out by expanding it.

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 a contradiction. Therefore, <math>|\phi|>1</math>.
-Suppose <math>f(x)=g(x)h(x)</math>. Since <math>f(0)=a_0</math>, one of <math>g(0)</math> and <math>h(0)</math> is 1. WLOG, assume <math>g(0)=1</math>. Then, let <math>g_n</math> be the leading coefficient of <math>g(x)</math>. If <math>\phi_1,\phi_2,\cdots,\phi_r</math> are the roots of <math>g(x)</math>, then <math>1<|\phi_1\phi_2\cdots \phi_n|=\frac{1}{|b|}\leq 1</math>. This is a contradiction, so <math>f(x)</math> is irreducible.
+Suppose <math>f(x)=g(x)h(x)</math>. Since <math>f(0)=a_0</math>, one of <math>g(0)</math> and <math>h(0)</math> is 1. WLOG, assume <math>g(0)=1</math>. Then, let <math>g_n</math> be the leading coefficient of <math>g(x)</math>. If <math>\phi_1,\phi_2,\cdots,\phi_r</math> are the roots of <math>g(x)</math>, then <math>1<|\phi_1\phi_2\cdots \phi_n|=\frac{1}{|g_n|}\leq 1</math>. This is a contradiction, so <math>f(x)</math> is irreducible.
 {{stub}}

Page

Toolbox

Search

Ostrowski's criterion: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:26, 21 January 2025

Proof