2007 USAMO Problems/Problem 5: Difference between revisions
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Now we assume the result holds for <math>\displaystyle{n}</math>. Note that <math>\displaystyle{a_{n}}</math> satisfies the [[recursion]] | Now we assume the result holds for <math>\displaystyle{n}</math>. Note that <math>\displaystyle{a_{n}}</math> satisfies the [[recursion]] | ||
<div style="text-align:center;"><math>\displaystyle{a_{n+1}= (a_{n}-1)^{7}+1} = a_{n}\left(a_{n}^{6}-7(a_{n}-1)(a_{n}^{2}-a_{n}+1)^{2}\right) | <div style="text-align:center;"><math>\displaystyle{a_{n+1}= (a_{n}-1)^{7}+1} = a_{n}\left(a_{n}^{6}-7(a_{n}-1)(a_{n}^{2}-a_{n}+1)^{2}\right)</math>.</div> | ||
Since <math>\displaystyle{a_n - 1}</math> is an odd power of <math>\displaystyle{7}</math>, <math>\displaystyle{7(a_n-1)}</math> is a perfect square. Therefore <math>\displaystyle{a_{n}^{6}-7(a_{n}-1)(a_{n}^{2}-a_{n}+1)^{2}}</math> is a difference of squares and thus [[composite]], i.e. it is divisible by <math>\displaystyle{2}</math> primes. By assumption, <math>\displaystyle{a_n}</math> is divisible by <math>\displaystyle{2n + 3}</math> primes. Thus <math>\displaystyle{a_{n+1}}</math> is divisible by <math>\displaystyle{2+ (2n + 3) = 2(n+1) + 3}</math> primes as desired. | Since <math>\displaystyle{a_n - 1}</math> is an odd power of <math>\displaystyle{7}</math>, <math>\displaystyle{7(a_n-1)}</math> is a perfect square. Therefore <math>\displaystyle{a_{n}^{6}-7(a_{n}-1)(a_{n}^{2}-a_{n}+1)^{2}}</math> is a difference of squares and thus [[composite]], i.e. it is divisible by <math>\displaystyle{2}</math> primes. By assumption, <math>\displaystyle{a_n}</math> is divisible by <math>\displaystyle{2n + 3}</math> primes. Thus <math>\displaystyle{a_{n+1}}</math> is divisible by <math>\displaystyle{2+ (2n + 3) = 2(n+1) + 3}</math> primes as desired. | ||
Revision as of 20:33, 7 May 2007
Problem
Prove that for every nonnegative integer
, the number
is the product of at least
(not necessarily distinct) primes.
Solution
Solution 1
We proceed by induction.
Let
be
. The result holds for
because
is the product of
primes.
Now we assume the result holds for
. Note that
satisfies the recursion
Since
is an odd power of
,
is a perfect square. Therefore
is a difference of squares and thus composite, i.e. it is divisible by
primes. By assumption,
is divisible by
primes. Thus
is divisible by
primes as desired.
Solution 2
Notice that
. Therefore it suffices to show that
is composite.
Let
. The expression becomes
which is the shortened form of the geometric series
. This can be factored as
Since
is an odd power of
,
is a perfect square, and so we can factor this by difference of squares. Therefore, it is composite.
See also
| 2007 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
| Preceded by Problem 4 |
Followed by Problem 6 | |
| 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | ||
| All USAMO Problems and Solutions | ||