2009 USAMO Problems/Problem 4: Difference between revisions
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
=&\left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right)^2 \\ | =&\left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right)^2 \\ | ||
\ge& (a_1+a_2+ a_3 + ... +a_{n})\left({1 \over a_1} + {1 \over a_2} + ... +{1 \over a_n}\right).\end{align*}</cmath> | \ge& (a_1+a_2+ a_3 + ... +a_{n})\left({1 \over a_1} + {1 \over a_2} + ... +{1 \over a_n}\right).\end{align*}</cmath> | ||
(Note that <math>n-2 \ge 0</math> since <math>n \ge 2</math> as given!) | |||
This implies that <math>3a_n -\frac{3a_1}{4} \ge 0 \iff 4a_n \ge a_1</math> as desired. | This implies that <math>3a_n -\frac{3a_1}{4} \ge 0 \iff 4a_n \ge a_1</math> as desired. | ||
Revision as of 08:48, 29 December 2020
Problem
For
let
,
, ...,
be positive real numbers such that
Prove that
.
Solution
Assume without loss of generality that
. Now we seek to prove that
.
By the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality,
Since
, clearly
, dividing yields:
as desired.
Alternative Solution (by Deng Tianle, username: Leole)
Assume without loss of generality that
.
Using the Cauchy–Bunyakovsky–Schwarz inequality and the inequality given,
(Note that
since
as given!)
This implies that
as desired.
See Also
| 2009 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
| Preceded by Problem 3 |
Followed by Problem 5 | |
| 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | ||
| All USAMO Problems and Solutions | ||
These problems are copyrighted © by the Mathematical Association of America.