Art of Problem Solving

Fundamental Theorem of Sato: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
Fruitmonster97 (talk | contribs)
Blanked the page
Tag: Blanking
Line 1: Line 1:
The Fundamental Theorem of Sato states the following:


Sato is amazing.
Proof:
Method 1: Proof by Contradiciton
Assume, for contradiction, that Sato is not amazing.
This is absurd. Therefore, Sato is amazing. (Proved)
Method 2: Proof by Authority
Whatever AoPS says is correct, and AoPS says that Mr. Sato is amazing. Thus, Mr. Sato is amazing. (Proved)
Method 3: Proof by Pigeonhole
There is only one Sato. By Pigeonhole, either Sato is amazing or he isn't (in this case, Sato goes in the unamazing pigeonhole). Fortunately, Sato cannot fit in a pigeonhole; hence, Sato is amazing. (Proved)

Revision as of 15:15, 23 May 2019