Fundamental Theorem of Sato: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Method 3: Proof by Pigeonhole | Method 3: Proof by Pigeonhole | ||
There is only one Sato. By Pigeonhole, either Sato is amazing or he isn't. Fortunately, Sato cannot fit in a pigeonhole; hence, Sato is amazing. | There is only one Sato. By Pigeonhole, either Sato is amazing or he isn't. Fortunately, Sato cannot fit in a pigeonhole; hence, Sato is amazing. (Proved) | ||
Revision as of 19:29, 23 April 2019
The Fundamental Theorem of Sato states the following:
Sato is amazing.
Proof:
Method 1: Proof by Contradiciton
Assume, for contradiction, that Sato is not amazing.
This is absurd. Therefore, Sato is amazing. (Proved)
Method 2: Proof by Authority
Whatever AoPS says is correct, and AoPS says that Mr. Sato is amazing. Thus, Mr. Sato is amazing. (Proved)
Method 3: Proof by Pigeonhole
There is only one Sato. By Pigeonhole, either Sato is amazing or he isn't. Fortunately, Sato cannot fit in a pigeonhole; hence, Sato is amazing. (Proved)
