1974 USAMO Problems/Problem 2: Difference between revisions
added solution 6 |
Abra kadabra (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
by GM-HM, as desired. | by GM-HM, as desired. | ||
==Solution 7== | |||
Replacing <math>a</math> with <math>ak</math>, <math>b</math> with <math>bk</math>, and <math>c</math> with <math>ck</math>, for some positive real <math>k</math> we get: | |||
<math>a^{ak}k^{ak}b^{bk}k^{bk}c^{ck}k^{ck} = a^{ak}b^{bk}c^{ck}k^{ak+bk+ck} \ge {k^3abc}^{{ak+bk+ck}/3} = k^{ak+bk+ck}{abc}^{{ak+bk+ck}/3}</math> | |||
This means that this inequality is homogeneous since both sides have the same power of <math>k</math> as a factor. Since the inequality is homogeneous, we can scale <math>abc</math> so that their product is <math>1</math>, i.e. <math>abc = 1</math>. This makes the inequality turn into something much more nicer to deal with. Now we have to prove: | |||
<math>a^ab^bc^c \ge 1</math> given that <math>abc = 1</math>. | |||
Note that <math>a^a \ge a</math> even if <math>a \le 1</math>. Therefore <math>a^a \ge a</math>, <math>b^b \ge b</math>, and <math>c^c \ge c</math>. Multiplying these together we get: | |||
<math>a^ab^bc^c \ge abc = 1</math>. This proves the desired result. Equality holds when <math>a = b = c = 1</math>. | |||
{{alternate solutions}} | {{alternate solutions}} | ||
Revision as of 21:44, 25 March 2020
Problem
Prove that if
,
, and
are positive real numbers, then
Solution 1
Consider the function
.
for
; therefore, it is a convex function and we can apply Jensen's Inequality:
Apply AM-GM to get
which implies
Rearranging,
Because
is an increasing function, we can conclude that:
which simplifies to the desired inequality.
Solution 2
Note that
.
So if we can prove that
and
, then we are done.
WLOG let
.
Note that
. Since
,
,
, and
, it follows that
.
Note that
. Since
,
,
, and
, it follows that
.
Thus,
, and cube-rooting both sides gives
as desired.
Solution 3
WLOG let
. Let
and
, where
and
.
We want to prove that
.
Simplifying and combining terms on each side, we get
.
Since
, we can divide out
to get
.
Take the
th root of each side and then cube both sides to get
.
This simplifies to
.
Since
and
, we only need to prove
for our given
.
WLOG, let
and
for
. Then our expression becomes
This is clearly true for
.
Solution 4
WLOG let
. Then sequence
majorizes
. Thus by Muirhead's Inequality, we have
, so
.
Solution 5
Let
and
Then
and a straightforward calculation reduces the problem to
WLOG, assume
Then
and
Therefore,
J.Z.
Solution 6
Cubing both sides of the given inequality gives
If we take
as the product of
's,
's, and
, we get that
by GM-HM, as desired.
Solution 7
Replacing
with
,
with
, and
with
, for some positive real
we get:
This means that this inequality is homogeneous since both sides have the same power of
as a factor. Since the inequality is homogeneous, we can scale
so that their product is
, i.e.
. This makes the inequality turn into something much more nicer to deal with. Now we have to prove:
given that
.
Note that
even if
. Therefore
,
, and
. Multiplying these together we get:
. This proves the desired result. Equality holds when
.
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.
See Also
| 1974 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
| Preceded by Problem 1 |
Followed by Problem 3 | |
| 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 | ||
| All USAMO Problems and Solutions | ||
- Simple Olympiad Inequality
- Hard inequality
- Inequality
- Some q's on usamo write ups
- ineq
- exponents (generalization)
These problems are copyrighted © by the Mathematical Association of America.