1982 IMO Problems/Problem 4: Difference between revisions
page/ problem/ solution |
format |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Problem== | |||
Prove that if <math>n</math> is a positive integer such that the equation <math>x^3-3xy^2+y^3=n</math> has a solution in integers <math>x,y</math>, then it has at least three such solutions. Show that the equation has no solutions in integers for <math>n=2891</math>. | Prove that if <math>n</math> is a positive integer such that the equation <math>x^3-3xy^2+y^3=n</math> has a solution in integers <math>x,y</math>, then it has at least three such solutions. Show that the equation has no solutions in integers for <math>n=2891</math>. | ||
==Solution== | |||
Suppose the equation <math>x^3-3xy^2+y^3=n</math> has solution in integers <math>(x,y)</math> with <math>y=x+k</math>. Then, completing the cube yields <math>(y-x)^3-3x^2y+2x^3</math>. Using the substitution <math>y=x+k</math> yields <math>k^3-3kx^2-x^3=n</math>. Notice that equality directly implies that <math>(k,-x)</math> is also a solution to the original equation. Applying the transformation again yields that <math>(-x-k,-k)</math> is also a solution. We show that these three solutions are indeed distinct: If <math>(x,y)=(k,-x)</math> then <math>x=k,x+k=-x</math> which only has solution <math>x=k=0</math> which implies that <math>n</math> is not a positive integer, a contradiction. Similarly, since the transformation from <math>(k,-x)</math> to <math>(-x-k,-k)</math> and <math>(-x-k,-k)</math> to <math>(x,y)</math> is the same as the transformation from <math>(x,y)</math> to <math>(k,-x)</math>, we have that the three solutions are pairwise distinct. | Suppose the equation <math>x^3-3xy^2+y^3=n</math> has solution in integers <math>(x,y)</math> with <math>y=x+k</math>. Then, completing the cube yields <math>(y-x)^3-3x^2y+2x^3</math>. Using the substitution <math>y=x+k</math> yields <math>k^3-3kx^2-x^3=n</math>. Notice that equality directly implies that <math>(k,-x)</math> is also a solution to the original equation. Applying the transformation again yields that <math>(-x-k,-k)</math> is also a solution. We show that these three solutions are indeed distinct: If <math>(x,y)=(k,-x)</math> then <math>x=k,x+k=-x</math> which only has solution <math>x=k=0</math> which implies that <math>n</math> is not a positive integer, a contradiction. Similarly, since the transformation from <math>(k,-x)</math> to <math>(-x-k,-k)</math> and <math>(-x-k,-k)</math> to <math>(x,y)</math> is the same as the transformation from <math>(x,y)</math> to <math>(k,-x)</math>, we have that the three solutions are pairwise distinct. | ||
For the case <math>n=2891</math>, notice that <math>7|n</math>. Considering all solutions modulo <math>7</math> of the equation <math>x^3-3xy^2+y^3\equiv0\pmod{7}</math> yields only <math>x\equiv y\equiv 0\pmod{7}</math>. But, this implies that <math>7^3</math> divides <math>2891</math> which is clearly not true. | For the case <math>n=2891</math>, notice that <math>7|n</math>. Considering all solutions modulo <math>7</math> of the equation <math>x^3-3xy^2+y^3\equiv0\pmod{7}</math> yields only <math>x\equiv y\equiv 0\pmod{7}</math>. But, this implies that <math>7^3</math> divides <math>2891</math> which is clearly not true. | ||
{{IMO box|year=1982|num-b=3|num-a=5}} | |||
[[Category:Olympiad Number Theory Problems]] | |||
Latest revision as of 21:52, 7 December 2008
Problem
Prove that if
is a positive integer such that the equation
has a solution in integers
, then it has at least three such solutions. Show that the equation has no solutions in integers for
.
Solution
Suppose the equation
has solution in integers
with
. Then, completing the cube yields
. Using the substitution
yields
. Notice that equality directly implies that
is also a solution to the original equation. Applying the transformation again yields that
is also a solution. We show that these three solutions are indeed distinct: If
then
which only has solution
which implies that
is not a positive integer, a contradiction. Similarly, since the transformation from
to
and
to
is the same as the transformation from
to
, we have that the three solutions are pairwise distinct.
For the case
, notice that
. Considering all solutions modulo
of the equation
yields only
. But, this implies that
divides
which is clearly not true.
| 1982 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
| Preceded by Problem 3 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 5 |
| All IMO Problems and Solutions | ||