2025 AMC 12A Problems/Problem 16: Difference between revisions
| (39 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Problem== | ==Problem== | ||
Triangle <imath>\triangle ABC</imath> has side lengths <imath>AB = 80</imath>, <imath>BC = 45</imath>, and <imath>AC = 75</imath>. The bisector <imath>\angle B</imath> and the altitude to side <imath>\overline{AB}</imath> intersect at point <imath>P</imath>. What is <imath>BP</imath>? | Triangle <imath>\triangle ABC</imath> has side lengths <imath>AB = 80</imath>, <imath>BC = 45</imath>, and <imath>AC = 75</imath>. The bisector of <imath>\angle B</imath> and the altitude to side <imath>\overline{AB}</imath> intersect at point <imath>P</imath>. What is <imath>BP</imath>? | ||
<imath>\textbf{(A)}~18\qquad\textbf{(B)}~19\qquad\textbf{(C)}~20\qquad\textbf{(D)}~21\qquad\textbf{(E)}~22</imath> | <imath>\textbf{(A)}~18\qquad\textbf{(B)}~19\qquad\textbf{(C)}~20\qquad\textbf{(D)}~21\qquad\textbf{(E)}~22</imath> | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Let <imath>CD \perp AB</imath> with foot <imath>D</imath>. Right triangles <imath>ACD</imath> and <imath>BCD</imath> give <imath>AC^2 = AD^2+CD^2</imath>, <imath>BC^2 = BD^2+CD^2</imath>, <imath>AC^2-BC^2 = AD^2-BD^2 =(AD-BD)(AD+BD)</imath>. | Let <imath>CD \perp AB</imath> with foot <imath>D</imath>. Right triangles <imath>ACD</imath> and <imath>BCD</imath> give <imath>AC^2 = AD^2+CD^2</imath>, <imath>BC^2 = BD^2+CD^2</imath>, <imath>AC^2-BC^2 = AD^2-BD^2 =(AD-BD)(AD+BD)</imath>. | ||
Since <imath>AD+BD = AB = 80</imath> and <imath>AC^2-BC^2 = 75^2-45^2 = 3600</imath>, | Since <imath>AD+BD = AB = 80</imath> and <imath>AC^2-BC^2 = 75^2-45^2 = 3600</imath>, we get the equation <imath>3600 = 80(AD-BD)</imath>. This equation simplifies to <imath>45 = AD - BD</imath>. We can solve the system of equations <imath>AD + BD = 80</imath> and <imath>AD - BD = 45</imath> easily via elimination, and we get <imath>AD = \frac{125}{2}</imath>, <imath>BD = \frac{35}{2}</imath>. <imath>CD^2 = AC^2-AD^2 = 75^2-\left(\frac{125}{2}\right)^2 = \frac{6875}{4}</imath>, <imath>CD = \frac{25\sqrt{11}}{2}</imath>. | ||
<imath>BD = \frac{35}{2}</imath>. <imath>CD^2 = AC^2-AD^2 = 75^2-\left(\frac{125}{2}\right)^2 = \frac{6875}{4}</imath>, <imath>CD = \frac{25\sqrt{11}}{2}</imath>. | |||
By Angle Bisector Theorem, <imath>\frac{DP}{PC} = \frac{DB}{BC} = \frac{\frac{35}{2}}{45} = \frac{7}{18}</imath>, <imath>PC = CD-DP</imath> thus, <imath>18DP = 7(CD-DP)</imath>, <imath>25DP = 7CD</imath>, <imath>DP = \left(\frac{7}{25}\right)CD = \left(\frac{7}{25}\right)\left(\frac{25\sqrt{11}}{2}\right) = \frac{7\sqrt{11}}{2}</imath>. <imath>BP^2 = BD^2+DP^2 = \left(\frac{35}{2}\right)^2+\left(\frac{7\sqrt{11}}{2}\right)^2 = \frac{1225}{4}+\frac{49(11)}{4} = \frac{1764}{4} = 441</imath>, thus <imath>BP = \boxed{\text{(D) }21}.</imath> | By Angle Bisector Theorem, <imath>\frac{DP}{PC} = \frac{DB}{BC} = \frac{\frac{35}{2}}{45} = \frac{7}{18}</imath>, <imath>PC = CD-DP</imath> thus, <imath>18DP = 7(CD-DP)</imath>, <imath>25DP = 7CD</imath>, <imath>DP = \left(\frac{7}{25}\right)CD = \left(\frac{7}{25}\right)\left(\frac{25\sqrt{11}}{2}\right) = \frac{7\sqrt{11}}{2}</imath>. <imath>BP^2 = BD^2+DP^2 = \left(\frac{35}{2}\right)^2+\left(\frac{7\sqrt{11}}{2}\right)^2 = \frac{1225}{4}+\frac{49(11)}{4} = \frac{1764}{4} = 441</imath>, thus <imath>BP = \boxed{\text{(D) }21}.</imath> | ||
~pigwash | ~pigwash | ||
~aldzandrtc(fixed logical jump) | |||
== Solution 2 (Law of Cosines) == | == Solution 2 (Law of Cosines) == | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
==Solution 4 (Rulerbash)== | ==Solution 4 (Rulerbash)== | ||
When we have a problem as such, involving a simple diagram with minimal instructions, I use a method I named "rulerbash". Rulerbash should only be used in specific cases and as a last resort, mainly in the event of a time crunch or a difficult problem. Start with the longest side, drawing a line with a length of <imath>8</imath> | Preface: When we have a problem as such, involving a simple diagram with minimal instructions, I use a method I named "rulerbash". Rulerbash should only be used in specific cases and as a last resort, mainly in the event of a time crunch or a difficult problem. | ||
Start with the longest side, drawing a line with a length of <imath>8\,\text{cm}</imath> (<imath>AB</imath>). Then, using a compass, draw 2 circles centered around points <imath>A</imath> and <imath>B</imath>, <imath>7.5\,\text{cm}</imath> and <imath>4.5\,\text{cm}</imath> radiuses respectfully. At the point of intersection of these 2 circles, we have point <imath>C</imath>, completing a perfectly scaled drawing of <imath>\triangle ABC</imath>. (Note the circles are not necessary with a bit of trial and error with the side lengths, they simply offer a way to get it done first try). | |||
<asy> | <asy> | ||
unitsize(0. | unitsize(0.25cm); | ||
pair A=(0,0), B=(8,0); | pair A=(0,0), B=(8,0); | ||
path cA=circle(A,7.5), cB=circle(B,4.5); | |||
path cA=circle(A, | pair C=intersectionpoint(cA,cB); | ||
pair C = intersectionpoint(cA,cB); | |||
draw(A--B); | draw(A--B); | ||
| Line 48: | Line 49: | ||
dot(A); dot(B); dot(C); | dot(A); dot(B); dot(C); | ||
label(" | label("A",A,S, fontsize(8)); | ||
label(" | label("B",B,S, fontsize(8)); | ||
label(" | label("C",C,N, fontsize(8)); | ||
label(" | label("8 cm",(A+B)/2, S, fontsize(6)); | ||
label(" | label("7.5 cm",(A+C)/2 + (-0.85,0.8),fontsize(6)); | ||
label(" | label("4.5 cm",(B+C)/2 + (1.75,-0.1),fontsize(6)); | ||
</asy> | |||
After this, dropping the altitude to <imath>AB</imath> is simple with a ruler and careful placement, and angle bisector can be estimated quite accurately. | |||
<asy> | |||
unitsize(0.55cm); | |||
import olympiad; | |||
pair A=(0,0), B=(8,0); | |||
pair C=intersectionpoint(circle(A,7.5),circle(B,4.5)); | |||
draw(A--B--C--cycle); | |||
pair F=foot(C,A,B); | |||
draw(C--F); | |||
draw(rightanglemark(A,F,C,2)); | |||
pair U=unit(unit(A-B)+unit(C-B)); | |||
pair P=intersectionpoint(B--(B+100*U), C--F); | |||
draw(B--P,dashed); | |||
dot(A);dot(B);dot(C);dot(P); | |||
label("A",A,S,fontsize(12)); | |||
label("B",B,S,fontsize(12)); | |||
label("C",C,N,fontsize(12)); | |||
label("P",P,NE,fontsize(12)); | |||
</asy> | |||
After all of this, we can reuse our ruler and measure <imath>BP = 2.1\,\text{cm}</imath>, and using our scale of <imath>80=8\,\text{cm}</imath>, our final answer is <imath>\boxed{\text{(D) }21}.</imath> | |||
~shreyan.chethan (notes by curryswish) | |||
==Solution 5 (No Trig)== | |||
Let \(D\) be the intersection of the altitude from \(C\) to \(AB\). To simplify calculations, divide all side lengths by \(5\), and multiply by \(5\) again at the end. | |||
First, we use Heron’s Formula, \(\sqrt{s(s-a)(s-b)(s-c)}\), to find the area. Let \([ABC]\) denote the area of \(\triangle ABC\). By Heron’s Formula, | |||
<cmath>[ABC] = \sqrt{20 \cdot 5 \cdot 4 \cdot 11} = 20\sqrt{11}.</cmath> | |||
Next, we find the altitude \(CD\) using the formula for the area of a triangle, \(\tfrac{1}{2}bh = \text{area}\): | |||
<cmath>\frac{1}{2}(16)(CD) = 20\sqrt{11} \quad \Rightarrow \quad CD = \frac{5\sqrt{11}}{2}.</cmath> | |||
We can use the Pythagorean Theorem in \(\triangle CDB\) to find \(DB\): | |||
<cmath>DB^2 + \frac{25 \cdot 11}{4} = 81 \quad \Rightarrow \quad 4DB^2 + 275 = 324 \quad \Rightarrow \quad DB^2 = \frac{49}{4}, </cmath> | |||
so \(DB = \tfrac{7}{2}\). | |||
Next, we use the Angle Bisector Theorem to find \(PD\). Let \(x = PC\) and \(y = PD\). Since \(x + y = \tfrac{5\sqrt{11}}{2}\), we have \(x = \tfrac{5\sqrt{11}}{2} - y\). | |||
From the given ratio, | |||
<cmath>\frac{9}{x} = \frac{7}{2y} \quad \Rightarrow \quad 18y = 7x.</cmath> | |||
Substituting \(x = \tfrac{5\sqrt{11}}{2} - y\), | |||
<cmath>18y = 7\left(\tfrac{5\sqrt{11}}{2} - y\right) \quad \Rightarrow \quad 25y = \tfrac{35\sqrt{11}}{2},</cmath> | |||
so \(y = \tfrac{7\sqrt{11}}{10}\). | |||
Now, using the Pythagorean Theorem again to find \(BP\): | |||
<cmath>\frac{49 \cdot 11}{100} + \frac{49}{4} = BP^2 \quad \Rightarrow \quad 100BP^2 = 49(11 + 25) = 49 \cdot 36,</cmath> | |||
so \(BP = \tfrac{42}{10} = \tfrac{21}{5}.\) | |||
Finally, multiplying the side lengths by \(5\) again gives \(BP = 21.\), or <imath>\boxed{\text{D}}.</imath> | |||
~Voidling | |||
==Solution 6 (Similar Triangle)== | |||
<asy> | |||
/* Figure drawn by reda*/ | |||
import geometry; | |||
unitsize(2.5); | |||
pair _A = (0, 0); | |||
pair _B = (80, 0); | |||
pair _C = (75*(75^2+80^2-45^2)/(2*75*80), 75*sqrt(1-((75^2+80^2-45^2)/(2*75*80))^2)); | |||
pair _D = (_C.x, 0); | |||
pair _E = (_A * 45 + _C * 80)/(45 + 80); | |||
pair _F = (_E.x, 0); | |||
pair _P = extension(_C, _D, _B, _E); | |||
draw(_B -- _A -- _C -- _B -- _E ^^ _C -- _D); | |||
draw(_E -- _F, dashed); | |||
/*dot(_A ^^ _B ^^ _C ^^ _D ^^ _E ^^ _F ^^ _P);*/ | |||
markrightangle(_B, _D, _P, 0.2*markangleradius()); | |||
markrightangle(_B, _F, _E, 0.2*markangleradius()); | |||
markangle(_P, _B, _D, radius = 0.25*markangleradius()); | |||
markangle(_P, _B, _D, radius = 0.3*markangleradius()); | |||
markangle(_C, _B, _P, radius = 0.25*markangleradius()); | |||
markangle(_C, _B, _P, radius = 0.3*markangleradius()); | |||
markangle(_B, _A, _C, radius = 0.25*markangleradius()); | |||
markangle(_B, _A, _C, radius = 0.3*markangleradius()); | |||
label("$A$", _A, S); | |||
label("$B$", _B, S); | |||
label("$C$", _C, N); | |||
label("$D$", _D, S); | |||
label("$E$", _E, NW); | |||
label("$F$", _F, S); | |||
label("$P$", _P, NE); | |||
label("$27$", (_C + _E)/2, N); | |||
label("$48$", (_A + _E)/2, N); | |||
label("$45$", (_B + _C)/2, E); | |||
label("$80$", (_A + _B)/2, 4S); | |||
</asy> | </asy> | ||
Due to Angle Bisector Theorem | |||
<cmath>\frac{CE}{AE} = \frac{BC}{BA} = \frac{45}{80} = \frac{9}{16}</cmath> | |||
<cmath>CE = AC \times \frac{9}{25} = 27</cmath> | |||
<cmath>AE = AC \times \frac{16}{25} = 48</cmath> | |||
Notice that <imath>\dfrac{CE}{CB} = \dfrac{CB}{CA} = \dfrac{3}{5}</imath>, <imath>\triangle CBE \sim \triangle CAB</imath>, <imath>\angle A = \angle CBE = \angle EBF</imath>, so <imath>\triangle ABE</imath> is isosceles triangle, hence | |||
<cmath>AF = BF</cmath> | |||
Notice that <imath>AF:FD = AE:EC = 16:9</imath>, <imath>DB = FB - FD</imath>, then | |||
<cmath>AF:DB = 16:7</cmath> | |||
Notice that <imath>\triangle PBD \sim \triangle EAF</imath>, <imath>PB = AE \times \dfrac{BD}{AF} = 48 \times \dfrac{7}{16} = \boxed{\text{(D) }21}.</imath> | |||
~[https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/User:Reda_mandymath 范_mandymath] | |||
==Solution 7 (Pythagoras+angle bisector theorem)== | |||
Let <imath>CD</imath> be the altitude to side <imath>AB</imath>, and let <imath>E</imath> be the point of intersection of the angle bisector of <imath>\angle B</imath>. Let <imath>P</imath> be the point of intersection of the angle bisector and the altitude. | |||
By Pythagoras, <imath>CD^2=BC^2-BD^2=AC^2-AD^2</imath> | |||
We let <imath>BD = x</imath>, so <imath>AD=80-x</imath> | |||
Now we have | |||
<cmath>45^2-x^2=75^2-(80-x)^2</cmath> | |||
(This looks complicated, but we can see that we are going to have two <imath>-x^2</imath> terms on both sides, so it cancels out) | |||
Simplifying and rearranging gives us <imath>80-2x=45</imath>, so <imath>x=\frac{35}{2}</imath> | |||
Therefore, <imath>BD=\frac{35}{2}</imath>, and <imath>AD=\frac{125}{2}</imath>. This gives us <imath>CD=\frac{25}{2}\sqrt{11}</imath> | |||
Now, note that in triangle <imath>BDC</imath>, <imath>BP</imath> bisects <imath>\angle DBC</imath> | |||
By the angle bisection theorem, we have | |||
<imath>\frac{BD}{DP}=\frac{BC}{CP}</imath> | |||
which gives us <imath>\frac{DP}{CP}=\frac{BD}{BC}=\frac{7}{18}</imath> | |||
~ | We have <imath>DP=\frac{7}{25}*CD=\frac{7}{2}\sqrt{11}</imath> and <imath> | ||
CP=\frac{18}{25}*CD=\frac{18}{2}\sqrt{11}</imath> | |||
So | |||
<imath>BP^2=BD*BC-DP*CP=\frac{35}{2}*45-\frac{7}{2}*\frac{18}{2}*11=441</imath> | |||
Therefore, <imath>BP=21</imath> | |||
(This is my first solution, pls point out any mistakes in math or LATEX). ~backtosq-1 | |||
== Solution 8 (Pythagora's + Double Angle Identity) == | |||
Since all the lengths share a factor of <imath>5</imath>, divide by <imath>5</imath> and multiply it back at the end for smaller numbers. Drop the altitude from vertex <imath>C</imath> to point <imath>D</imath> on <imath>AB</imath>. Then comparing the altitude by Pythagora's on both sides gives <cmath>9^2-x^2=15^2-(16-x)^2=15^2-16^2+32x-x^2=-31+32x-x^2</cmath> | |||
Cancelling the <imath>-x^2</imath> then solving gives us <imath>x=\frac{112}{32}=\frac{7}{2}</imath>. Since <imath>\triangle BDC</imath> is a right triangle with <imath>\angle B=2\theta</imath>, we find <imath>\cos(2\theta)=\frac{\frac{7}{2}}{9}=\frac{7}{18}</imath>. | |||
Let <imath>\theta=\angle PBA=\angle PBC</imath>. Because <imath>\angle B</imath> is opposite to the leg <imath>9<15</imath> and not the hypotenuse, we must have that <imath>2\theta</imath> is acute, likewise for <imath>\theta</imath>. Hence, <imath>\cos \theta>0</imath>. | |||
Thus, using cosine definition on <imath>\triangle BDP</imath> and the double angle identity <imath>\cos 2\theta=2\cos^2 \theta-1</imath>, we get | |||
<cmath>\cos \theta=\frac{7/2}{BP}=\sqrt{ \frac{1+\cos 2\theta}{2} }=\sqrt{ \frac{1+\frac{7}{18}}{2} }=\sqrt{ \frac{25}{36} }=\frac{5}{6}</cmath> | |||
Finally, solving for <imath>BP=\frac{7}{2\cos\theta}=\frac{7}{2}\cdot \frac{6}{5}=\frac{21}{5}</imath>. Scaling back to the original diagram by <imath>5</imath> gives <imath>\boxed{\textbf{(D)}~21}</imath>. | |||
== Video Solution (In 3 Mins) (Really Easy) == | |||
https://youtu.be/nAimLnvSTwQ?si=85o8QuW5HbDldWdU ~ Pi Academy | |||
==Video Solution 1 by OmegaLearn== | ==Video Solution 1 by OmegaLearn== | ||
https://youtu.be/DI-q_-cYMVU | https://youtu.be/DI-q_-cYMVU | ||
==Video Solution by SpreadTheMathLove== | |||
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAeyV60Hu5c | |||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
Latest revision as of 22:15, 11 November 2025
- The following problem is from both the 2025 AMC 10A #23 and 2025 AMC 12A #16, so both problems redirect to this page.
Problem
Triangle
has side lengths
,
, and
. The bisector of
and the altitude to side
intersect at point
. What is
?
Solution 1
Let
with foot
. Right triangles
and
give
,
,
.
Since
and
, we get the equation
. This equation simplifies to
. We can solve the system of equations
and
easily via elimination, and we get
,
.
,
.
By Angle Bisector Theorem,
,
thus,
,
,
.
, thus
~pigwash ~aldzandrtc(fixed logical jump)
Solution 2 (Law of Cosines)
Scale this down to a
triangle (we will multiply the result by
in the end).
Note that
, so
, which simplifies to
. Then
(positive root since the angle is acute). Therefore, we have
, assuming that
is the foot of the altitude.
There are many ways to proceed from here to find
. Note that by Heron's formula, the area of the scaled-down triangle is
. Therefore,
. Using Pythagorean Theorem, we get
. Therefore, we get
, so
, and we scale up by
to get
.
~ScoutViolet
Solution 3 (Stewarts)
Let the foot of the altitude coming from
on segment
be
. Using the fact that
is a common leg in right triangles
and
, we have
Expanding gives
so
Let the foot of the angle bisector from
to
be point
. Since
is the angle bisector of
, we can use the angle bisector theorem. This gives
so
and
. Now we can use Stewart’s Theorem to find
. We have
To simplify this expression, just divide by the greatest common divisor and solve from there. In the end, we get
. Let
, so
. Draw the altitude from
down to
. Let the foot of this altitude be
. Since
, we have
. Hence, we can write the equation
Solving gives
, so
. Since
, we also have
, so we have
Solving for
gives
or
~evanhliu2009
Solution 4 (Rulerbash)
Preface: When we have a problem as such, involving a simple diagram with minimal instructions, I use a method I named "rulerbash". Rulerbash should only be used in specific cases and as a last resort, mainly in the event of a time crunch or a difficult problem.
Start with the longest side, drawing a line with a length of
(
). Then, using a compass, draw 2 circles centered around points
and
,
and
radiuses respectfully. At the point of intersection of these 2 circles, we have point
, completing a perfectly scaled drawing of
. (Note the circles are not necessary with a bit of trial and error with the side lengths, they simply offer a way to get it done first try).
After this, dropping the altitude to
is simple with a ruler and careful placement, and angle bisector can be estimated quite accurately.
After all of this, we can reuse our ruler and measure
, and using our scale of
, our final answer is
~shreyan.chethan (notes by curryswish)
Solution 5 (No Trig)
Let \(D\) be the intersection of the altitude from \(C\) to \(AB\). To simplify calculations, divide all side lengths by \(5\), and multiply by \(5\) again at the end.
First, we use Heron’s Formula, \(\sqrt{s(s-a)(s-b)(s-c)}\), to find the area. Let \([ABC]\) denote the area of \(\triangle ABC\). By Heron’s Formula,
Next, we find the altitude \(CD\) using the formula for the area of a triangle, \(\tfrac{1}{2}bh = \text{area}\):
We can use the Pythagorean Theorem in \(\triangle CDB\) to find \(DB\):
so \(DB = \tfrac{7}{2}\).
Next, we use the Angle Bisector Theorem to find \(PD\). Let \(x = PC\) and \(y = PD\). Since \(x + y = \tfrac{5\sqrt{11}}{2}\), we have \(x = \tfrac{5\sqrt{11}}{2} - y\).
From the given ratio,
Substituting \(x = \tfrac{5\sqrt{11}}{2} - y\),
so \(y = \tfrac{7\sqrt{11}}{10}\).
Now, using the Pythagorean Theorem again to find \(BP\):
so \(BP = \tfrac{42}{10} = \tfrac{21}{5}.\)
Finally, multiplying the side lengths by \(5\) again gives \(BP = 21.\), or
~Voidling
Solution 6 (Similar Triangle)
Due to Angle Bisector Theorem
Notice that
,
,
, so
is isosceles triangle, hence
Notice that
,
, then
Notice that
,
Solution 7 (Pythagoras+angle bisector theorem)
Let
be the altitude to side
, and let
be the point of intersection of the angle bisector of
. Let
be the point of intersection of the angle bisector and the altitude.
By Pythagoras,
We let
, so
Now we have
(This looks complicated, but we can see that we are going to have two
terms on both sides, so it cancels out)
Simplifying and rearranging gives us
, so
Therefore,
, and
. This gives us
Now, note that in triangle
,
bisects
By the angle bisection theorem, we have
which gives us
We have
and
So
Therefore,
(This is my first solution, pls point out any mistakes in math or LATEX). ~backtosq-1
Solution 8 (Pythagora's + Double Angle Identity)
Since all the lengths share a factor of
, divide by
and multiply it back at the end for smaller numbers. Drop the altitude from vertex
to point
on
. Then comparing the altitude by Pythagora's on both sides gives
Cancelling the
then solving gives us
. Since
is a right triangle with
, we find
.
Let
. Because
is opposite to the leg
and not the hypotenuse, we must have that
is acute, likewise for
. Hence,
.
Thus, using cosine definition on
and the double angle identity
, we get
Finally, solving for
. Scaling back to the original diagram by
gives
.
Video Solution (In 3 Mins) (Really Easy)
https://youtu.be/nAimLnvSTwQ?si=85o8QuW5HbDldWdU ~ Pi Academy
Video Solution 1 by OmegaLearn
Video Solution by SpreadTheMathLove
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAeyV60Hu5c
See Also
| 2025 AMC 10A (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
| Preceded by Problem 22 |
Followed by Problem 24 | |
| 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 | ||
| All AMC 10 Problems and Solutions | ||
| 2025 AMC 12A (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | |
| Preceded by Problem 15 |
Followed by Problem 17 |
| 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 | |
| All AMC 12 Problems and Solutions | |
These problems are copyrighted © by the Mathematical Association of America.