P-adic valuation: Difference between revisions
Virajnirmal (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''p''-adic valuation}} | {{DISPLAYTITLE:''p''-adic valuation}} | ||
{{title restriction|< | {{title restriction|<imath>p</imath>-adic valuation}} | ||
For some [[integer]] < | For some [[integer]] <imath>n</imath> and [[prime]] <imath>p</imath>, the '''<imath>p</imath>-adic valuation''' of n, denoted <imath>\nu_p(n)</imath>, represents the largest power of <imath>p</imath> which [[divides]] <imath>n</imath>. In other words, it is the value of the exponent of <imath>p</imath> in the [[prime factorization]] of <imath>n</imath>. | ||
== Basic Examples == | == Basic Examples == | ||
#< | #<imath>\nu_3(18)=\nu_3(2\cdot3^2)=2</imath>. | ||
#< | #<imath>\nu_5(-5)=\nu_5(-1\cdot5^1)=1</imath>. | ||
#< | #<imath>\nu_{13}(28)=\nu_{13}(2^2\cdot7\cdot13^0)=0</imath>. | ||
== Properties == | == Properties == | ||
* For positive integers < | * For positive integers <imath>x</imath> and <imath>y</imath>, <cmath>\nu_p(xy)=\nu_p(x)+\nu_p(y).</cmath> This property follows from the fact that <imath>p^ap^b=p^{a+b}</imath>. | ||
* Furthermore, <cmath>\nu_p(x+y)\geq\min{\nu_p(x)+\nu_p(y)}.</cmath> This follows because we can factor out < | * Furthermore, <cmath>\nu_p(x+y)\geq\min{\nu_p(x)+\nu_p(y)}.</cmath> This follows because we can factor out <imath>\min{\nu_p(x)+\nu_p(y)}</imath> copies of <imath>p</imath> from the sum <imath>x+y</imath>. Note that equality holds if <imath>\nu_p(x)\neq\nu_p(y)</imath>, because, in this case, after factoring out <imath>\min{\nu_p(x)+\nu_p(y)}</imath> copies of <imath>p</imath> from the sum <imath>x+y</imath>, the remaining factor cannot be congruent to <imath>0</imath> [[modulo]] <imath>p</imath>, because one of the terms will be congruent to <imath>0\pmod p</imath>, while the other will not (because all common factors of <imath>p</imath> have already been factored out). | ||
* If < | * If <imath>n</imath> is a positive integer, because <imath>n\geq p^{\nu_p(n)}</imath>, we deduce that <cmath>\nu_p(n)\leq \log_pn,</cmath> because [[logarithms]] are [[Sequence#Monotone Sequences|monotone increasing]] for all bases greater than <imath>1</imath>, which includes all primes. | ||
* [[Lifting the Exponent]]: A series of identities, among which the most prominent is: <cmath>\nu_p (x^n-y^n)=\nu_p (x-y)+\nu_p (n)</cmath> for odd primes < | * [[Lifting the Exponent]]: A series of identities, among which the most prominent is: <cmath>\nu_p (x^n-y^n)=\nu_p (x-y)+\nu_p (n)</cmath> for odd primes <imath>p</imath> if <imath>p|(x-y)</imath>. | ||
* [[Legendre's Formula]]: < | * [[Legendre's Formula]]: <imath>\nu_p (n!)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\left\lfloor\frac{n}{p^k}\right\rfloor</imath>. | ||
== Extension to Rational Numbers == | == Extension to Rational Numbers == | ||
< | <imath>\nu_p(0)</imath> is defined to be [[infinite]]. | ||
Furthermore, as seen in the properties above, <cmath>\nu_p(xy)=\nu_p(x)+\nu_p(y).</cmath> From this inspiration, we can define fractional inputs as follows: <cmath>\nu_p\left(\frac xy\right)=\nu_p(x)-\nu_p(y).</cmath> Note that it does not matter if < | Furthermore, as seen in the properties above, <cmath>\nu_p(xy)=\nu_p(x)+\nu_p(y).</cmath> From this inspiration, we can define fractional inputs as follows: <cmath>\nu_p\left(\frac xy\right)=\nu_p(x)-\nu_p(y).</cmath> Note that it does not matter if <imath>\tfrac xy</imath> is simplified or not, because | ||
\begin{align*} | \begin{align*} | ||
\nu_p\left(\frac{kx}{ky}\right) &= \nu_p(kx)-\nu_p(ky) \\ | \nu_p\left(\frac{kx}{ky}\right) &= \nu_p(kx)-\nu_p(ky) \\ | ||
Latest revision as of 16:39, 9 November 2025
- The title of this article has been capitalized due to technical restrictions. The correct title should be
-adic valuation.
For some integer
and prime
, the
-adic valuation of n, denoted
, represents the largest power of
which divides
. In other words, it is the value of the exponent of
in the prime factorization of
.
Basic Examples
.
.
.
Properties
- For positive integers
and
,
This property follows from the fact that
. - Furthermore,
This follows because we can factor out
copies of
from the sum
. Note that equality holds if
, because, in this case, after factoring out
copies of
from the sum
, the remaining factor cannot be congruent to
modulo
, because one of the terms will be congruent to
, while the other will not (because all common factors of
have already been factored out). - If
is a positive integer, because
, we deduce that
because logarithms are monotone increasing for all bases greater than
, which includes all primes. - Lifting the Exponent: A series of identities, among which the most prominent is:
for odd primes
if
. - Legendre's Formula:
.
Extension to Rational Numbers
is defined to be infinite.
Furthermore, as seen in the properties above,
From this inspiration, we can define fractional inputs as follows:
Note that it does not matter if
is simplified or not, because
\begin{align*}
\nu_p\left(\frac{kx}{ky}\right) &= \nu_p(kx)-\nu_p(ky) \\
&= (\nu_p(k)+\nu_p(x))-(\nu_p(k)+\nu_p(y)) \\
&=\nu_p(x)-\nu_p(y) \\
&=\nu_p\left(\frac xy\right).
\end{align*}
See Also
This article is a stub. Help us out by expanding it.
.