Mock AIME I 2012 Problems/Problem 15: Difference between revisions
Mathgeek2006 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
m see also box |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Solution== | ==Solution== | ||
First, note that <math>x^{2k}+x^k+1=(x^{3k}-1)/(x^k-1)</math>. Let <math>z_1,z_2,\dots,z_n</math> be the distinct complex numbers that were toggled, where <math>n</math> is a positive integer, and for each complex number <math>z</math>, let <math>t(z)</math> be the number of times <math>z</math> was toggled. Then, we have this relation: | First, note that <math>x^{2k}+x^k+1=(x^{3k}-1)/(x^k-1)</math>. Let <math>z_1,z_2,\dots,z_n</math> be the distinct complex numbers that were toggled, where <math>n</math> is a positive integer, and for each complex number <math>z</math>, let <math>t(z)</math> be the number of times <math>z</math> was toggled. Then, we have this relation: | ||
<cmath> | |||
\prod_{k=1}^{20}(x^{2k}+x^k+1)=\prod_{k=1}^{20}\frac{x^{3k}-1}{x^k-1}=\prod_{i=1}^n (x-z_i)^{t(z_i)}.\tag{1} | |||
</cmath> | |||
The problem is equivalent to finding the number of complex numbers <math>z_i</math> such that <math>t(z_i)</math> is odd. | The problem is equivalent to finding the number of complex numbers <math>z_i</math> such that <math>t(z_i)</math> is odd. | ||
We now focus on the second formula in | We now focus on the second formula in <math>(1)</math>. From this formula, we know that all of the <math>z_i</math> must be roots of unity. Furthermore, for each <math>z_i</math>, <math>t(z_i)</math> is the number of factors in the numerator that have <math>z_i</math> as a root minus the number of factors in the denominator that have <math>z_i</math> as a root, since no polynomial of the form <math>x^n-1</math> has a repeated root. | ||
Now let <math>\zeta_n</math> denote a primitive <math>n</math>th root of unity. First, when <math>3\nmid n</math>, there are an equal number of factors in the numerator of the fraction as in the denominator of the fraction which have <math>\zeta_n</math> as a root, so <math>t(\zeta_n)=0</math> in this case. | Now let <math>\zeta_n</math> denote a primitive <math>n</math>th root of unity. First, when <math>3\nmid n</math>, there are an equal number of factors in the numerator of the fraction as in the denominator of the fraction which have <math>\zeta_n</math> as a root, so <math>t(\zeta_n)=0</math> in this case. | ||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
</cmath> | </cmath> | ||
Adding up the entries in the last column of the table gives the final answer <math>\boxed{220}</math>. | Adding up the entries in the last column of the table gives the final answer <math>\boxed{220}</math>. | ||
==See Also== | |||
*<math>\textbf{Last Problem}</math> | |||
*[[Mock AIME I 2012 Problems/Problem 14| Previous Problem]] | |||
*[[Mock AIME I 2012 Problems]] | |||
Latest revision as of 09:02, 11 March 2025
Problem
Paula the Painter initially paints every complex number black. When Paula toggles a complex number, she paints it white if it was previously black, and black if it was previously white. For each
, Paula progressively toggles the roots of
. Let
be the number of complex numbers are white at the end of this process. Find
.
Solution
First, note that
. Let
be the distinct complex numbers that were toggled, where
is a positive integer, and for each complex number
, let
be the number of times
was toggled. Then, we have this relation:
The problem is equivalent to finding the number of complex numbers
such that
is odd.
We now focus on the second formula in
. From this formula, we know that all of the
must be roots of unity. Furthermore, for each
,
is the number of factors in the numerator that have
as a root minus the number of factors in the denominator that have
as a root, since no polynomial of the form
has a repeated root.
Now let
denote a primitive
th root of unity. First, when
, there are an equal number of factors in the numerator of the fraction as in the denominator of the fraction which have
as a root, so
in this case.
We now consider the case when
. The numerator has
factors with
as a root, while the denominator has
factors with
as a root. Therefore, in this case,
. As there are
primitive
th roots of unity for each
, every
with
odd will contribute
to the sum. The table below shows the calculations for
.
Adding up the entries in the last column of the table gives the final answer
.